Thin client
Similar articles
Reviews section
More from IT Week
ADVERTISEMENT
Reviews Disclaimer
Readers are reminded that the opinions expressed, and the results published in connection with reviews and/or laboratory test reports carried out on computing systems and/or related items are confined to, and representative of, only those goods supplied and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase.

Group review: Windows XPE thin clients

IT Week Labs put five thin clients running Windows XP Embedded through their paces

Price: £389 to £416 + VAT
Manufacturer: Various



Ratings
Rate this product
Verdict

All the models we reviewed offered ample processing for server-hosted or browser-based enterprise applications


Daniel Robinson, IT Week 27 Apr 2007

ADVERTISEMENT

Thin clients are back in vogue and corporate deployments are rising, thanks in part to security worries with PCs and a growing trend for enterprise applications to live on a server in the back office. UK technology services provider AN4 Group said in February that it expected thin computing projects to grow substantially during 2007, following a 12 percent rise in its revenues from thin computing sales and projects during 2006.

The term “thin client” now covers a range of devices with varying capabilities. The most basic models simply act as a remote screen and keyboard for a user session hosted elsewhere, typically on a server. Other thin-client devices are more flexible and are able to run some applications locally.

For this article, we looked at several of this latter type based on Windows XP Embedded (XPE), a version of Microsoft’s platform designed to boot from Flash memory. Windows XPE is modular, enabling vendors to cut out unwanted components or include required drivers and applications.

These models are closer to locked-down PCs than simple terminals. They are more powerful than traditional thin clients, and this increase in computing power is largely due to the spread of enterprise applications, which are often Java-based and require a measure of local processing power.

Outside of browser-based applications, most terminals use one of two software schemes to connect to server-hosted sessions; Microsoft’s Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) or the Independent Computing Architecture (ICA) from Citrix.

Many thin clients come with local applications such as Adobe’s Reader for Acrobat PDF files. It is also possible to add applications.

However, a feature of XPE called Enhanced Write Filter (EWF) protects the Flash storage from alteration by redirecting file writes to RAM configured as a drive volume. The filter must be disabled by an administrator to apply updates or configuration changes.

Many thin client vendors have their own management tools and ship their devices with a pre-installed client agent. Wyse has its Rapport suite, for example, while Neoware has ezRemote Manager. HP, however, ships its devices with an Altiris client agent.

This could be an advantage for firms already operating Symantec’s Altiris tools. If not, the proprietary suites are likely to prove more cost-effective as these are often provided for no additional charge.

During testing, we encountered an issue in some devices that caused Internet Explorer to crash when viewing some web sites. Microsoft identified older versions of Adobe’s Flash plug-in as the cause. The three models that were affected by the problem – from HP, Igel Technology and Thinspace – all had Flash version 6. The Neoware and Wyse models, running Flash 7 and 8 respectively, did not appear to be affected.

This is only a minor issue, but companies should ensure an up-to-date Flash version is installed when purchasing.

Read the reviews:

Neoware m100

Thinspace RWT300XPBA

HP Compaq t5720

Igel Technoloy 5610XP Premium

Wyse V90 Dual-Video


All Desktops

Like this story? Spread the news by clicking below:

Post this to Delicious del.icio.us    Post this to Digg Digg this    Post this to reddit reddit!

Permalink for this story

M A R K E T P L A C E
Sponsored links